AUC Score :
Short-Term Revised1 :
Dominant Strategy : Speculative Trend
Time series to forecast n:
ML Model Testing : Modular Neural Network (Market Volatility Analysis)
Hypothesis Testing : Paired T-Test
Surveillance : Major exchange and OTC
1The accuracy of the model is being monitored on a regular basis.(15-minute period)
2Time series is updated based on short-term trends.
Key Points
This exclusive content is only available to premium users.Summary
This exclusive content is only available to premium users.
ML Model Testing
n:Time series to forecast
p:Price signals of ASCAU stock
j:Nash equilibria (Neural Network)
k:Dominated move of ASCAU stock holders
a:Best response for ASCAU target price
For further technical information as per how our model work we invite you to visit the article below:
How do PredictiveAI algorithms actually work?
ASCAU Stock Forecast (Buy or Sell) Strategic Interaction Table
Strategic Interaction Table Legend:
X axis: *Likelihood% (The higher the percentage value, the more likely the event will occur.)
Y axis: *Potential Impact% (The higher the percentage value, the more likely the price will deviate.)
Z axis (Grey to Black): *Technical Analysis%
Rating | Short-Term | Long-Term Senior |
---|---|---|
Outlook* | B2 | B3 |
Income Statement | Baa2 | C |
Balance Sheet | Baa2 | B3 |
Leverage Ratios | Caa2 | B3 |
Cash Flow | C | Caa2 |
Rates of Return and Profitability | B2 | Caa2 |
*Financial analysis is the process of evaluating a company's financial performance and position by neural network. It involves reviewing the company's financial statements, including the balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement, as well as other financial reports and documents.
How does neural network examine financial reports and understand financial state of the company?This exclusive content is only available to premium users.This exclusive content is only available to premium users.This exclusive content is only available to premium users.This exclusive content is only available to premium users.
References
- Lai TL, Robbins H. 1985. Asymptotically efficient adaptive allocation rules. Adv. Appl. Math. 6:4–22
- Jorgenson, D.W., Weitzman, M.L., ZXhang, Y.X., Haxo, Y.M. and Mat, Y.X., 2023. S&P 500: Is the Bull Market Ready to Run Out of Steam?. AC Investment Research Journal, 220(44).
- D. S. Bernstein, S. Zilberstein, and N. Immerman. The complexity of decentralized control of Markov Decision Processes. In UAI '00: Proceedings of the 16th Conference in Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA, June 30 - July 3, 2000, pages 32–37, 2000.
- Athey S, Imbens G, Wager S. 2016a. Efficient inference of average treatment effects in high dimensions via approximate residual balancing. arXiv:1604.07125 [math.ST]
- Christou, C., P. A. V. B. Swamy G. S. Tavlas (1996), "Modelling optimal strategies for the allocation of wealth in multicurrency investments," International Journal of Forecasting, 12, 483–493.
- Abadie A, Imbens GW. 2011. Bias-corrected matching estimators for average treatment effects. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 29:1–11
- Breusch, T. S. A. R. Pagan (1979), "A simple test for heteroskedasticity and random coefficient variation," Econometrica, 47, 1287–1294.