AUC Score :
Short-term Tactic1 :
Dominant Strategy :
Time series to forecast n:
ML Model Testing : Multi-Instance Learning (ML)
Hypothesis Testing : ElasticNet Regression
Surveillance : Major exchange and OTC
1Short-term revised.
2Time series is updated based on short-term trends.
Key Points
This exclusive content is only available to premium users.About Dow Jones U.S. Select Health Care Providers Index
This exclusive content is only available to premium users.
ML Model Testing
n:Time series to forecast
p:Price signals of Dow Jones U.S. Select Health Care Providers index
j:Nash equilibria (Neural Network)
k:Dominated move of Dow Jones U.S. Select Health Care Providers index holders
a:Best response for Dow Jones U.S. Select Health Care Providers target price
For further technical information as per how our model work we invite you to visit the article below:
How do KappaSignal algorithms actually work?
Dow Jones U.S. Select Health Care Providers Index Forecast Strategic Interaction Table
Strategic Interaction Table Legend:
X axis: *Likelihood% (The higher the percentage value, the more likely the event will occur.)
Y axis: *Potential Impact% (The higher the percentage value, the more likely the price will deviate.)
Z axis (Grey to Black): *Technical Analysis%
| Rating | Short-Term | Long-Term Senior |
|---|---|---|
| Outlook | B1 | Ba3 |
| Income Statement | Caa2 | Baa2 |
| Balance Sheet | Caa2 | Baa2 |
| Leverage Ratios | Baa2 | Ba2 |
| Cash Flow | Baa2 | C |
| Rates of Return and Profitability | C | Caa2 |
*An aggregate rating for an index summarizes the overall sentiment towards the companies it includes. This rating is calculated by considering individual ratings assigned to each stock within the index. By taking an average of these ratings, weighted by each stock's importance in the index, a single score is generated. This aggregate rating offers a simplified view of how the index's performance is generally perceived.
How does neural network examine financial reports and understand financial state of the company?
References
- V. Mnih, K. Kavukcuoglu, D. Silver, A. Rusu, J. Veness, M. Bellemare, A. Graves, M. Riedmiller, A. Fidjeland, G. Ostrovski, S. Petersen, C. Beattie, A. Sadik, I. Antonoglou, H. King, D. Kumaran, D. Wierstra, S. Legg, and D. Hassabis. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature, 518(7540):529–533, 02 2015.
- Vilnis L, McCallum A. 2015. Word representations via Gaussian embedding. arXiv:1412.6623 [cs.CL]
- M. Petrik and D. Subramanian. An approximate solution method for large risk-averse Markov decision processes. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 2012.
- P. Artzner, F. Delbaen, J. Eber, and D. Heath. Coherent measures of risk. Journal of Mathematical Finance, 9(3):203–228, 1999
- Dudik M, Langford J, Li L. 2011. Doubly robust policy evaluation and learning. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1097–104. La Jolla, CA: Int. Mach. Learn. Soc.
- Brailsford, T.J. R.W. Faff (1996), "An evaluation of volatility forecasting techniques," Journal of Banking Finance, 20, 419–438.
- V. Borkar. A sensitivity formula for the risk-sensitive cost and the actor-critic algorithm. Systems & Control Letters, 44:339–346, 2001