AUC Score :
Short-term Tactic1 :
Dominant Strategy :
Time series to forecast n:
ML Model Testing : Supervised Machine Learning (ML)
Hypothesis Testing : Linear Regression
Surveillance : Major exchange and OTC
1Short-term revised.
2Time series is updated based on short-term trends.
Key Points
This exclusive content is only available to premium users.About Dow Jones U.S. Oil & Gas Index
This exclusive content is only available to premium users.
ML Model Testing
n:Time series to forecast
p:Price signals of Dow Jones U.S. Oil & Gas index
j:Nash equilibria (Neural Network)
k:Dominated move of Dow Jones U.S. Oil & Gas index holders
a:Best response for Dow Jones U.S. Oil & Gas target price
For further technical information as per how our model work we invite you to visit the article below:
How do KappaSignal algorithms actually work?
Dow Jones U.S. Oil & Gas Index Forecast Strategic Interaction Table
Strategic Interaction Table Legend:
X axis: *Likelihood% (The higher the percentage value, the more likely the event will occur.)
Y axis: *Potential Impact% (The higher the percentage value, the more likely the price will deviate.)
Z axis (Grey to Black): *Technical Analysis%
| Rating | Short-Term | Long-Term Senior |
|---|---|---|
| Outlook | B3 | Baa2 |
| Income Statement | Baa2 | Baa2 |
| Balance Sheet | C | Ba2 |
| Leverage Ratios | B3 | Baa2 |
| Cash Flow | B3 | B2 |
| Rates of Return and Profitability | Caa2 | Baa2 |
*An aggregate rating for an index summarizes the overall sentiment towards the companies it includes. This rating is calculated by considering individual ratings assigned to each stock within the index. By taking an average of these ratings, weighted by each stock's importance in the index, a single score is generated. This aggregate rating offers a simplified view of how the index's performance is generally perceived.
How does neural network examine financial reports and understand financial state of the company?
References
- J. Ott. A Markov decision model for a surveillance application and risk-sensitive Markov decision processes. PhD thesis, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 2010.
- Hirano K, Porter JR. 2009. Asymptotics for statistical treatment rules. Econometrica 77:1683–701
- Mikolov T, Yih W, Zweig G. 2013c. Linguistic regularities in continuous space word representations. In Pro- ceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp. 746–51. New York: Assoc. Comput. Linguist.
- Jorgenson, D.W., Weitzman, M.L., ZXhang, Y.X., Haxo, Y.M. and Mat, Y.X., 2023. Google's Stock Price Set to Soar in the Next 3 Months. AC Investment Research Journal, 220(44).
- Cheung, Y. M.D. Chinn (1997), "Further investigation of the uncertain unit root in GNP," Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 15, 68–73.
- Bastani H, Bayati M. 2015. Online decision-making with high-dimensional covariates. Work. Pap., Univ. Penn./ Stanford Grad. School Bus., Philadelphia/Stanford, CA
- Arora S, Li Y, Liang Y, Ma T. 2016. RAND-WALK: a latent variable model approach to word embeddings. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. 4:385–99