YCBD Stock Forecast

Outlook: YCBD is assigned short-term B2 & long-term Ba2 estimated rating.
AUC Score : What is AUC Score?
Short-term Tactic¹ :
Dominant Strategy :
Time series to forecast n: for Weeks²
ML Model Testing : Modular Neural Network (Market Volatility Analysis)
Hypothesis Testing : Lasso Regression
Surveillance : Major exchange and OTC

¹Short-term revised.

²Time series is updated based on short-term trends.

Key Points

This exclusive content is only available to premium users.

About YCBD

This exclusive content is only available to premium users.

This exclusive content is only available to premium users.

ML Model Testing

F(Lasso Regression)^6,7= $\begin{array}{cccc}{p}_{\mathrm{a}1}& p_{\mathrm{a}2}& \dots & p_{1n}\\ & ⋮\\ p_{j1}& p_{j2}& \dots & p_{jn}\\ & ⋮\\ p_{k1}& p_{k2}& \dots & p_{kn}\\ & ⋮\\ p_{n1}& p_{n2}& \dots & p_{nn}\end{array}$ X R(Modular Neural Network (Market Volatility Analysis))^3,4,5 X S(n):→ 8 Weeks $\overrightarrow{R}=\left(r_1,r_2,r_3\right)$

n:Time series to forecast

p:Price signals of YCBD stock

j:Nash equilibria (Neural Network)

k:Dominated move of YCBD stock holders

a:Best response for YCBD target price

 

For further technical information as per how our model work we invite you to visit the article below: 

How do KappaSignal algorithms actually work?

YCBD Stock Forecast (Buy or Sell) Strategic Interaction Table

Strategic Interaction Table Legend:

X axis: *Likelihood% (The higher the percentage value, the more likely the event will occur.)

Y axis: *Potential Impact% (The higher the percentage value, the more likely the price will deviate.)

Z axis (Grey to Black): *Technical Analysis%

CBDMD Inc. Common Stock Financial Outlook and Forecast

CBDMD Inc., operating in the burgeoning cannabidiol (CBD) market, faces a complex financial outlook characterized by both significant growth potential and considerable challenges. The company's revenue streams are primarily derived from the sale of a wide range of CBD products, including tinctures, gummies, topicals, and pet products, marketed under its flagship CBDMD brand and other associated brands. The overall market for CBD products has experienced robust expansion, driven by increasing consumer awareness of potential wellness benefits, a broader acceptance of hemp-derived products, and evolving regulatory landscapes. CBDMD's strategy has focused on building a recognizable brand through marketing efforts and a diversified product portfolio. However, the highly competitive nature of the CBD industry, coupled with fluctuating consumer demand and the ongoing uncertainty surrounding federal regulations in the United States, creates a dynamic operating environment.

Financially, CBDMD has historically grappled with profitability. While revenue has seen periods of growth, the company has often incurred net losses. This is attributable to several factors, including substantial investments in marketing and brand development, research and development for new product formulations, and the operational costs associated with manufacturing and distribution. The company's ability to achieve sustainable profitability hinges on its capacity to scale its operations efficiently, control its cost of goods sold, and manage its substantial marketing expenditures effectively. Furthermore, the impact of a potentially adverse regulatory environment can lead to unpredictable fluctuations in demand and necessitate costly adjustments to product offerings and business practices, further pressuring financial performance.

Looking ahead, the financial forecast for CBDMD is subject to a delicate balance of opportunities and risks. The continued growth of the CBD market presents a clear avenue for revenue expansion. Innovations in product development and the potential for broader mainstream acceptance of CBD could further fuel this growth. However, several critical factors will shape CBDMD's financial trajectory. The company's success will largely depend on its ability to achieve greater operational efficiencies and translate revenue growth into consistent profitability. Managing inventory effectively, optimizing supply chain logistics, and achieving economies of scale in production are crucial. Moreover, the competitive landscape demands continuous innovation and strong brand loyalty to maintain market share and pricing power. Diversification of product offerings beyond the core CBD market, if strategically executed, could also provide additional revenue streams and mitigate some of the sector-specific risks.

The prediction for CBDMD's financial outlook is cautiously optimistic, contingent upon significant strategic execution and favorable market developments. A positive prediction hinges on the company successfully navigating the evolving regulatory landscape, demonstrating a clear path to profitability through cost management and revenue diversification, and capitalizing on the expanding consumer demand for CBD products. Risks to this positive outlook are substantial and include: intensified competition leading to pricing pressures and market share erosion; unfavorable changes in federal or state regulations that could restrict product availability, marketing, or outright ban certain CBD products; unexpected increases in raw material costs or supply chain disruptions; and the continued challenge of achieving consistent profitability amidst high operational and marketing expenditures. Failure to effectively address these risks could lead to continued financial struggles and negatively impact shareholder value.

Rating	Short-Term	Long-Term Senior
Outlook	B2	Ba2
Income Statement	Caa2	Ba3
Balance Sheet	Ba3	Baa2
Leverage Ratios	Ba3	Ba1
Cash Flow	B2	Baa2
Rates of Return and Profitability	B2	Caa2

*Financial analysis is the process of evaluating a company's financial performance and position by neural network. It involves reviewing the company's financial statements, including the balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement, as well as other financial reports and documents.
How does neural network examine financial reports and understand financial state of the company?

References

1. Wan M, Wang D, Goldman M, Taddy M, Rao J, et al. 2017. Modeling consumer preferences and price sensitiv- ities from large-scale grocery shopping transaction logs. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on the World Wide Web, pp. 1103–12. New York: ACM
2. Mnih A, Teh YW. 2012. A fast and simple algorithm for training neural probabilistic language models. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 419–26. La Jolla, CA: Int. Mach. Learn. Soc.
3. Breusch, T. S. (1978), "Testing for autocorrelation in dynamic linear models," Australian Economic Papers, 17, 334–355.
4. V. Mnih, A. P. Badia, M. Mirza, A. Graves, T. P. Lillicrap, T. Harley, D. Silver, and K. Kavukcuoglu. Asynchronous methods for deep reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 33nd International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2016, New York City, NY, USA, June 19-24, 2016, pages 1928–1937, 2016
5. Chen X. 2007. Large sample sieve estimation of semi-nonparametric models. In Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 6B, ed. JJ Heckman, EE Learner, pp. 5549–632. Amsterdam: Elsevier
6. Scott SL. 2010. A modern Bayesian look at the multi-armed bandit. Appl. Stoch. Models Bus. Ind. 26:639–58
7. Alexander, J. C. Jr. (1995), "Refining the degree of earnings surprise: A comparison of statistical and analysts' forecasts," Financial Review, 30, 469–506.