AUC Score :
Short-term Tactic1 :
Dominant Strategy :
Time series to forecast n:
ML Model Testing : Supervised Machine Learning (ML)
Hypothesis Testing : Chi-Square
Surveillance : Major exchange and OTC
1Short-term revised.
2Time series is updated based on short-term trends.
Key Points
This exclusive content is only available to premium users.About S&P Bitcoin Index
This exclusive content is only available to premium users.
ML Model Testing
n:Time series to forecast
p:Price signals of S&P Bitcoin index
j:Nash equilibria (Neural Network)
k:Dominated move of S&P Bitcoin index holders
a:Best response for S&P Bitcoin target price
For further technical information as per how our model work we invite you to visit the article below:
How do KappaSignal algorithms actually work?
S&P Bitcoin Index Forecast Strategic Interaction Table
Strategic Interaction Table Legend:
X axis: *Likelihood% (The higher the percentage value, the more likely the event will occur.)
Y axis: *Potential Impact% (The higher the percentage value, the more likely the price will deviate.)
Z axis (Grey to Black): *Technical Analysis%
| Rating | Short-Term | Long-Term Senior |
|---|---|---|
| Outlook | B2 | B1 |
| Income Statement | Ba1 | Caa2 |
| Balance Sheet | B3 | B2 |
| Leverage Ratios | C | Baa2 |
| Cash Flow | Caa2 | B3 |
| Rates of Return and Profitability | Baa2 | B1 |
*An aggregate rating for an index summarizes the overall sentiment towards the companies it includes. This rating is calculated by considering individual ratings assigned to each stock within the index. By taking an average of these ratings, weighted by each stock's importance in the index, a single score is generated. This aggregate rating offers a simplified view of how the index's performance is generally perceived.
How does neural network examine financial reports and understand financial state of the company?
References
- Pennington J, Socher R, Manning CD. 2014. GloVe: global vectors for word representation. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods on Natural Language Processing, pp. 1532–43. New York: Assoc. Comput. Linguist.
- Abadie A, Imbens GW. 2011. Bias-corrected matching estimators for average treatment effects. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 29:1–11
- P. Milgrom and I. Segal. Envelope theorems for arbitrary choice sets. Econometrica, 70(2):583–601, 2002
- Candès EJ, Recht B. 2009. Exact matrix completion via convex optimization. Found. Comput. Math. 9:717
- Li L, Chen S, Kleban J, Gupta A. 2014. Counterfactual estimation and optimization of click metrics for search engines: a case study. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on the World Wide Web, pp. 929–34. New York: ACM
- Abadir, K. M., K. Hadri E. Tzavalis (1999), "The influence of VAR dimensions on estimator biases," Econometrica, 67, 163–181.
- D. Bertsekas. Dynamic programming and optimal control. Athena Scientific, 1995.