TR/CC CRB ex Energy ER index outlook signals shifting commodity dynamics

Outlook: TR/CC CRB ex Energy ER index is assigned short-term B1 & long-term B2 estimated rating.
AUC Score : What is AUC Score?
Short-term Tactic¹ :
Dominant Strategy :
Time series to forecast n: for Weeks²
ML Model Testing : Modular Neural Network (Emotional Trigger/Responses Analysis)
Hypothesis Testing : Statistical Hypothesis Testing
Surveillance : Major exchange and OTC

¹Short-term revised.

²Time series is updated based on short-term trends.

Key Points

The TR/CC CRB ex Energy ER index is poised for moderate growth driven by expected demand increases in industrial metals and agricultural commodities. However, a significant risk lies in the potential for geopolitical disruptions and unforeseen supply chain bottlenecks which could create price volatility and dampen the anticipated gains.

About TR/CC CRB ex Energy ER Index

The TR/CC CRB ex Energy ER index represents a broad and diversified commodity benchmark, excluding the energy sector. Its composition typically encompasses a range of agricultural products, industrial metals, precious metals, and other raw materials. The "TR" signifies a Total Return index, meaning it accounts for income generated from holding the underlying commodities, such as through futures contracts. "CC" likely refers to a specific commodity index provider or methodology. The "ER" denotes an Excess Return index, which calculates returns above a risk-free rate, providing a measure of a commodity portfolio's performance relative to a theoretical investment in cash.

This index serves as a valuable tool for investors and analysts seeking to understand and track the performance of the commodity markets outside of energy's influence. By stripping out energy prices, which can be highly volatile and driven by distinct geopolitical and supply-demand dynamics, the TR/CC CRB ex Energy ER index offers a clearer view of the broader inflationary pressures and economic trends reflected in non-energy raw materials. It is often used for portfolio diversification, as commodities can exhibit low correlation with traditional asset classes like stocks and bonds, and as a hedge against inflation.

TR/CC CRB ex Energy ER Index Forecast Model

This document outlines the development of a machine learning model designed to forecast the TR/CC CRB ex Energy ER index. Recognizing the complex interplay of factors influencing commodity prices excluding energy, our approach combines advanced statistical techniques with robust economic principles. The core of our model leverages a Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) architecture, specifically a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network, chosen for its proven ability to capture temporal dependencies and non-linear relationships within time-series data. Input features will encompass a comprehensive suite of macroeconomic indicators, including global manufacturing and services Purchasing Managers' Indexes (PMIs), inflation rates (CPI), industrial production growth, interest rate differentials, and currency exchange rates of major economies. Additionally, we will incorporate measures of geopolitical risk and supply chain disruptions to account for exogenous shocks. The model's objective is to identify patterns and predict future movements of the TR/CC CRB ex Energy ER index with a high degree of accuracy.

The data preprocessing phase is critical to ensure the efficacy of the forecasting model. Raw data will undergo rigorous cleaning, normalization, and feature engineering. Stationarity tests will be applied to time-series data, and differencing or other transformations will be employed where necessary. Missing values will be handled through imputation techniques such as k-nearest neighbors or time-series specific imputation methods. Feature selection will be performed using techniques like Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) and L1 regularization to identify the most predictive variables, thereby reducing dimensionality and mitigating the risk of overfitting. The time horizon for historical data will be determined through sensitivity analysis, aiming to capture sufficient historical context without introducing excessive noise from outdated information. The model will be trained on a substantial historical dataset, with a portion reserved for validation and out-of-sample testing to objectively assess its performance.

The evaluation of the forecasting model will be conducted using a combination of standard time-series metrics. Key performance indicators will include Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE). We will also assess directional accuracy and the model's ability to capture significant turning points in the index. Backtesting will be a crucial component of our evaluation process, simulating real-world trading scenarios to understand the practical implications of the model's predictions. Continuous monitoring and retraining of the model will be implemented to adapt to evolving market dynamics and maintain predictive power over time. The ultimate goal is to provide a reliable and actionable forecasting tool for stakeholders interested in the TR/CC CRB ex Energy ER index.

ML Model Testing

F(Statistical Hypothesis Testing)^6,7= $\begin{array}{cccc}{p}_{\mathrm{a}1}& p_{\mathrm{a}2}& \dots & p_{1n}\\ & ⋮\\ p_{j1}& p_{j2}& \dots & p_{jn}\\ & ⋮\\ p_{k1}& p_{k2}& \dots & p_{kn}\\ & ⋮\\ p_{n1}& p_{n2}& \dots & p_{nn}\end{array}$ X R(Modular Neural Network (Emotional Trigger/Responses Analysis))^3,4,5 X S(n):→ 4 Weeks $\begin{array}{l}\int e^x\mathrm{rx}\end{array}$

n:Time series to forecast

p:Price signals of TR/CC CRB ex Energy ER index

j:Nash equilibria (Neural Network)

k:Dominated move of TR/CC CRB ex Energy ER index holders

a:Best response for TR/CC CRB ex Energy ER target price

 

For further technical information as per how our model work we invite you to visit the article below: 

How do KappaSignal algorithms actually work?

TR/CC CRB ex Energy ER Index Forecast Strategic Interaction Table

Strategic Interaction Table Legend:

X axis: *Likelihood% (The higher the percentage value, the more likely the event will occur.)

Y axis: *Potential Impact% (The higher the percentage value, the more likely the price will deviate.)

Z axis (Grey to Black): *Technical Analysis%

TR/CC CRB ex Energy ER Index: Financial Outlook and Forecast

The TR/CC CRB ex Energy ER (Excess Return) Index, a crucial benchmark for broad commodity exposure excluding energy, is currently navigating a complex global economic landscape. The index's performance is intrinsically linked to the supply and demand dynamics of a diverse basket of agricultural, industrial metals, and precious metals. Recent trends suggest a period of potential recalibration as inflationary pressures, though showing signs of easing in some regions, remain a significant factor influencing consumer spending and industrial production. Global trade patterns, geopolitical stability, and monetary policy decisions by major central banks are all contributing to the prevailing market sentiment. The performance of key underlying commodities within the index, such as grains and base metals, will be pivotal in shaping its trajectory. Analysts are closely monitoring shifts in production levels, inventory build-ups or drawdowns, and the pace of economic recovery in key consuming nations. The interplay of these factors creates a dynamic environment where both upside and downside risks are present.

Looking ahead, the financial outlook for the TR/CC CRB ex Energy ER Index is likely to be characterized by sector-specific divergences. Agricultural commodities, for instance, may find support from ongoing global population growth and dietary shifts, though weather patterns and government agricultural policies will remain critical variables. Industrial metals, on the other hand, are highly sensitive to the pace of global industrial activity, particularly in sectors like construction and manufacturing. The transition to renewable energy sources, while a long-term positive for certain metals, could also lead to periods of price volatility as supply chains adapt. Precious metals, often considered a safe-haven asset, will likely continue to be influenced by inflation expectations, interest rate differentials, and geopolitical uncertainty. The broader market sentiment towards risk assets will also play a role, affecting investor appetite for commodity exposure. Therefore, a monolithic outlook for the entire index is challenging, with performance likely to be uneven across its constituent components.

The forecasting horizon for the TR/CC CRB ex Energy ER Index suggests a period of moderate growth with considerable volatility. Several factors underpin this outlook. The continued implementation of fiscal stimulus measures in various economies could provide a baseline level of demand for commodities. Furthermore, the ongoing efforts to decarbonize economies will likely drive structural demand for certain metals essential to green technologies. However, the persistent threat of inflation could lead to tighter monetary policies, potentially dampening global economic growth and, consequently, commodity demand. Supply-side disruptions, whether due to weather events, geopolitical conflicts, or labor disputes, remain a constant risk that could lead to sharp price increases for specific commodities. The overall economic health of major trading partners, especially China, will also be a significant determinant of demand across a broad range of industrial and agricultural goods.

The prediction for the TR/CC CRB ex Energy ER Index over the medium term leans towards a positive, albeit cautious, trend. The fundamental drivers of demand, particularly in agriculture and for metals essential to the energy transition, are expected to provide a supportive backdrop. However, significant risks threaten this optimistic outlook. A sharper-than-anticipated slowdown in global economic growth, triggered by persistent inflation and aggressive interest rate hikes, could lead to a substantial downturn in commodity prices. Escalation of geopolitical tensions could disrupt supply chains further and increase economic uncertainty, leading to a flight to safety that would negatively impact most commodities. Conversely, a more synchronized global economic recovery and a de-escalation of geopolitical conflicts could unlock further upside potential for the index. The interplay between these positive drivers and negative risks will dictate the ultimate trajectory of the TR/CC CRB ex Energy ER Index.

Rating	Short-Term	Long-Term Senior
Outlook	B1	B2
Income Statement	Ba2	B3
Balance Sheet	C	Ba1
Leverage Ratios	B1	B3
Cash Flow	Ba1	Caa2
Rates of Return and Profitability	Ba3	B3

*An aggregate rating for an index summarizes the overall sentiment towards the companies it includes. This rating is calculated by considering individual ratings assigned to each stock within the index. By taking an average of these ratings, weighted by each stock's importance in the index, a single score is generated. This aggregate rating offers a simplified view of how the index's performance is generally perceived.
How does neural network examine financial reports and understand financial state of the company?

References

1. G. Konidaris, S. Osentoski, and P. Thomas. Value function approximation in reinforcement learning using the Fourier basis. In AAAI, 2011
2. Semenova V, Goldman M, Chernozhukov V, Taddy M. 2018. Orthogonal ML for demand estimation: high dimensional causal inference in dynamic panels. arXiv:1712.09988 [stat.ML]
3. C. Szepesvári. Algorithms for Reinforcement Learning. Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2010
4. Bastani H, Bayati M. 2015. Online decision-making with high-dimensional covariates. Work. Pap., Univ. Penn./ Stanford Grad. School Bus., Philadelphia/Stanford, CA
5. Chamberlain G. 2000. Econometrics and decision theory. J. Econom. 95:255–83
6. F. A. Oliehoek, M. T. J. Spaan, and N. A. Vlassis. Optimal and approximate q-value functions for decentralized pomdps. J. Artif. Intell. Res. (JAIR), 32:289–353, 2008
7. Vapnik V. 2013. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Berlin: Springer