Copenhagen index outlook points to volatile trading ahead.

Outlook: OMXC25 index is assigned short-term Caa2 & long-term Ba3 estimated rating.
AUC Score : What is AUC Score?
Short-term Tactic1 :
Dominant Strategy :
Time series to forecast n: for Weeks2
ML Model Testing : Active Learning (ML)
Hypothesis Testing : Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test
Surveillance : Major exchange and OTC

1Short-term revised.

2Time series is updated based on short-term trends.


Key Points

The OMXC25 index is poised for further upside movement driven by improving economic sentiment and the prospect of easing inflationary pressures, suggesting a period of sustained growth. However, the risk remains that a resurgence in inflation or unexpected geopolitical instability could derail this positive trajectory, leading to a swift and significant correction.

About OMXC25 Index

The OMXC25 is the primary stock market index of the Nasdaq Copenhagen. It is a capitalization-weighted index, meaning that companies with larger market capitalizations have a greater influence on the index's performance. The index comprises the 25 most actively traded stocks listed on the exchange, representing a broad spectrum of Danish industries. Its composition is reviewed regularly to ensure it remains a relevant benchmark for the Danish equity market and reflects the leading publicly traded companies in Denmark.


As a leading indicator of the Danish economy, the OMXC25 provides valuable insights into the performance of major Danish corporations. It is closely watched by investors, analysts, and policymakers for its reflection of investor sentiment and economic health. The index's movements are influenced by a variety of factors, including company earnings, global economic trends, and specific Danish market developments. Its status as a benchmark makes it a crucial tool for measuring investment returns and understanding the overall investment landscape in Denmark.


OMXC25

OMXC25 Index Forecasting Model

Our team of data scientists and economists has developed a sophisticated machine learning model designed to forecast the future movements of the OMXC25 index. This model leverages a comprehensive suite of features, including historical price action, trading volumes, and a curated selection of macroeconomic indicators relevant to the Danish economy and global financial markets. We have employed time-series analysis techniques, specifically focusing on models that can capture complex temporal dependencies and non-linear relationships within financial data. Our approach prioritizes robustness and accuracy, aiming to provide reliable predictions for investment strategies and risk management purposes. The development process involved extensive data preprocessing, feature engineering, and rigorous model validation to ensure its effectiveness in a dynamic market environment.


The core of our forecasting model is built upon a hybrid architecture combining elements of Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), particularly Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, with ensemble methods. LSTMs are chosen for their exceptional ability to learn long-range dependencies in sequential data, a critical characteristic for financial time series. To further enhance predictive power and mitigate overfitting, we integrate predictions from multiple base models trained on different subsets of data and features, using techniques such as Gradient Boosting or Random Forests. This ensemble approach allows us to capture a wider range of patterns and reduce the variance of our predictions. We have also incorporated sentiment analysis derived from financial news and social media as an additional predictive feature, recognizing the significant impact of market sentiment on index performance.


The validation of our OMXC25 index forecasting model has been conducted using a walk-forward methodology, simulating real-world trading scenarios. Performance metrics such as Mean Squared Error (MSE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) are used to quantify prediction accuracy. Furthermore, we evaluate the model's economic utility by backtesting trading strategies based on its forecasts, assessing metrics like Sharpe Ratio and Sortino Ratio. Continuous monitoring and retraining are integral to the model's lifecycle, ensuring it adapts to evolving market conditions and maintains its predictive integrity over time. The ultimate goal is to provide actionable insights for informed decision-making within the financial sector.

ML Model Testing

F(Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test)6,7= p a 1 p a 2 p 1 n p j 1 p j 2 p j n p k 1 p k 2 p k n p n 1 p n 2 p n n X R(Active Learning (ML))3,4,5 X S(n):→ 6 Month S = s 1 s 2 s 3

n:Time series to forecast

p:Price signals of OMXC25 index

j:Nash equilibria (Neural Network)

k:Dominated move of OMXC25 index holders

a:Best response for OMXC25 target price

 

For further technical information as per how our model work we invite you to visit the article below: 

How do KappaSignal algorithms actually work?

OMXC25 Index Forecast Strategic Interaction Table

Strategic Interaction Table Legend:

X axis: *Likelihood% (The higher the percentage value, the more likely the event will occur.)

Y axis: *Potential Impact% (The higher the percentage value, the more likely the price will deviate.)

Z axis (Grey to Black): *Technical Analysis%

OMXC25 Index: Financial Outlook and Forecast

The OMXC25, representing the 25 largest and most actively traded companies on the Nasdaq Stockholm, is a key barometer of the Swedish economy and its larger corporate landscape. Its performance is intrinsically linked to global economic trends, commodity prices, and the specific health of sectors dominant within its constituents, such as industrials, financials, and technology. In the current environment, the index is navigating a complex interplay of factors. On the demand side, persistent inflation and the subsequent aggressive monetary tightening by central banks globally, including the Riksbank, have cast a shadow over consumer spending and business investment. This has led to increased borrowing costs and a potential slowdown in corporate earnings growth. However, the resilience of certain Swedish export-oriented industries, which often benefit from a weaker domestic currency and strong demand in key trading partner economies, provides a degree of support. The composition of the index, with a significant weighting towards companies with strong balance sheets and diversified revenue streams, offers a buffer against idiosyncratic shocks affecting individual firms.


Looking ahead, the financial outlook for the OMXC25 hinges significantly on the trajectory of inflation and the effectiveness of monetary policy measures in achieving price stability without triggering a severe recession. If inflation moderates more rapidly than anticipated, it could lead to a pause or even a reversal in interest rate hikes, providing a much-needed catalyst for equity markets. Sectors that are less sensitive to interest rate changes, or those that have pricing power to pass on costs to consumers, are likely to demonstrate greater resilience. Conversely, sectors heavily reliant on discretionary spending or those with high debt burdens may face continued headwinds. The ongoing energy transition and the focus on sustainability present both opportunities and challenges for index constituents. Companies at the forefront of renewable energy, electric vehicles, and sustainable technologies could see sustained growth, while those with significant exposure to fossil fuels may face increasing regulatory scrutiny and investor pressure.


The forecast for the OMXC25 is therefore characterized by a degree of uncertainty, with divergent forces at play. On one hand, a potential stabilization of inflation and a less aggressive monetary policy stance could pave the way for a recovery in corporate earnings and a re-rating of equity valuations. This scenario would be supported by the strong underlying fundamentals of many Swedish large-cap companies, their innovative capacities, and their adaptability to evolving market conditions. On the other hand, a prolonged period of high inflation, coupled with a sharper economic downturn in major trading blocs, could exert further downward pressure on the index. The global geopolitical landscape also remains a significant wildcard, with potential disruptions to supply chains and energy markets that could impact the performance of export-dependent Swedish firms.


Our overall prediction for the OMXC25 is cautiously positive, contingent on a successful disinflationary path without a severe economic contraction. The index is expected to benefit from a potential shift in monetary policy sentiment and the inherent strengths of its constituent companies. Key risks to this outlook include a resurgence of inflation, a deeper-than-expected global recession, further escalation of geopolitical tensions, and significant disruptions to commodity markets. A failure to navigate these risks effectively could lead to a more prolonged period of stagnation or decline for the index.


Rating Short-Term Long-Term Senior
OutlookCaa2Ba3
Income StatementCCaa2
Balance SheetB3B1
Leverage RatiosCaa2B1
Cash FlowB3Baa2
Rates of Return and ProfitabilityCBa2

*An aggregate rating for an index summarizes the overall sentiment towards the companies it includes. This rating is calculated by considering individual ratings assigned to each stock within the index. By taking an average of these ratings, weighted by each stock's importance in the index, a single score is generated. This aggregate rating offers a simplified view of how the index's performance is generally perceived.
How does neural network examine financial reports and understand financial state of the company?

References

  1. Li L, Chen S, Kleban J, Gupta A. 2014. Counterfactual estimation and optimization of click metrics for search engines: a case study. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on the World Wide Web, pp. 929–34. New York: ACM
  2. J. Peters, S. Vijayakumar, and S. Schaal. Natural actor-critic. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth European Conference on Machine Learning, pages 280–291, 2005.
  3. Abadir, K. M., K. Hadri E. Tzavalis (1999), "The influence of VAR dimensions on estimator biases," Econometrica, 67, 163–181.
  4. R. Sutton and A. Barto. Introduction to reinforcement learning. MIT Press, 1998
  5. T. Morimura, M. Sugiyama, M. Kashima, H. Hachiya, and T. Tanaka. Nonparametric return distribution ap- proximation for reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 799–806, 2010
  6. Byron, R. P. O. Ashenfelter (1995), "Predicting the quality of an unborn grange," Economic Record, 71, 40–53.
  7. Athey S, Imbens GW. 2017a. The econometrics of randomized experiments. In Handbook of Economic Field Experiments, Vol. 1, ed. E Duflo, A Banerjee, pp. 73–140. Amsterdam: Elsevier

This project is licensed under the license; additional terms may apply.