XPOF Stock Forecast

Outlook: XPOF is assigned short-term B2 & long-term Ba3 estimated rating.
AUC Score : What is AUC Score?
Short-term Tactic¹ :
Dominant Strategy :
Time series to forecast n: for Weeks²
ML Model Testing : Multi-Task Learning (ML)
Hypothesis Testing : Logistic Regression
Surveillance : Major exchange and OTC

¹Short-term revised.

²Time series is updated based on short-term trends.

Key Points

XPOF's future hinges on its ability to effectively integrate and scale its growing portfolio of brands, which presents a significant growth opportunity. However, increasing competition in the fitness sector and potential economic downturns impacting discretionary spending pose substantial risks to its revenue streams and membership growth. Furthermore, reliance on franchise partners introduces a degree of operational risk as their performance directly influences XPOF's overall success.

About XPOF

This exclusive content is only available to premium users.

XPOF Stock Forecasting Model

Our team of data scientists and economists has developed a sophisticated machine learning model designed to forecast the future price movements of Xponential Fitness Inc. Class A Common Stock (XPOF). This model leverages a multi-faceted approach, integrating a variety of data sources to capture the complex dynamics influencing stock performance. Key data inputs include historical stock price data, trading volume, and relevant macroeconomic indicators such as interest rates and inflation. Furthermore, we incorporate company-specific financial statements, including revenue growth, profitability margins, and debt levels, as well as sector-specific performance metrics and news sentiment analysis derived from financial news and social media. The model's architecture is

ML Model Testing

F(Logistic Regression)^6,7= $\begin{array}{cccc}{p}_{\mathrm{a}1}& p_{\mathrm{a}2}& \dots & p_{1n}\\ & ⋮\\ p_{j1}& p_{j2}& \dots & p_{jn}\\ & ⋮\\ p_{k1}& p_{k2}& \dots & p_{kn}\\ & ⋮\\ p_{n1}& p_{n2}& \dots & p_{nn}\end{array}$ X R(Multi-Task Learning (ML))^3,4,5 X S(n):→ 8 Weeks $\sum _{i=1}^n\left(a_i\right)$

n:Time series to forecast

p:Price signals of XPOF stock

j:Nash equilibria (Neural Network)

k:Dominated move of XPOF stock holders

a:Best response for XPOF target price

 

For further technical information as per how our model work we invite you to visit the article below: 

How do KappaSignal algorithms actually work?

XPOF Stock Forecast (Buy or Sell) Strategic Interaction Table

Strategic Interaction Table Legend:

X axis: *Likelihood% (The higher the percentage value, the more likely the event will occur.)

Y axis: *Potential Impact% (The higher the percentage value, the more likely the price will deviate.)

Z axis (Grey to Black): *Technical Analysis%

This exclusive content is only available to premium users.

Rating	Short-Term	Long-Term Senior
Outlook	B2	Ba3
Income Statement	Ba3	C
Balance Sheet	C	Baa2
Leverage Ratios	B2	Baa2
Cash Flow	Baa2	B2
Rates of Return and Profitability	C	Ba3

*Financial analysis is the process of evaluating a company's financial performance and position by neural network. It involves reviewing the company's financial statements, including the balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement, as well as other financial reports and documents.
How does neural network examine financial reports and understand financial state of the company?

References

1. Hirano K, Porter JR. 2009. Asymptotics for statistical treatment rules. Econometrica 77:1683–701
2. Chamberlain G. 2000. Econometrics and decision theory. J. Econom. 95:255–83
3. Hartford J, Lewis G, Taddy M. 2016. Counterfactual prediction with deep instrumental variables networks. arXiv:1612.09596 [stat.AP]
4. M. Sobel. The variance of discounted Markov decision processes. Applied Probability, pages 794–802, 1982
5. uyer, S. Whiteson, B. Bakker, and N. A. Vlassis. Multiagent reinforcement learning for urban traffic control using coordination graphs. In Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, European Conference, ECML/PKDD 2008, Antwerp, Belgium, September 15-19, 2008, Proceedings, Part I, pages 656–671, 2008.
6. Z. Wang, T. Schaul, M. Hessel, H. van Hasselt, M. Lanctot, and N. de Freitas. Dueling network architectures for deep reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pages 1995–2003, 2016.
7. G. Shani, R. Brafman, and D. Heckerman. An MDP-based recommender system. In Proceedings of the Eigh- teenth conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence, pages 453–460. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 2002