AUC Score :
Short-term Tactic1 :
Dominant Strategy :
Time series to forecast n:
ML Model Testing : Modular Neural Network (Market Volatility Analysis)
Hypothesis Testing : Beta
Surveillance : Major exchange and OTC
1Short-term revised.
2Time series is updated based on short-term trends.
Key Points
The TR/CC CRB ex Energy TR index is projected to experience moderate volatility. Anticipated price fluctuations are likely due to shifting macroeconomic conditions and supply chain dynamics influencing industrial and agricultural commodities. Potential risks include adverse weather events disrupting agricultural yields and geopolitical instability impacting raw material supplies, both of which could drive prices upwards. Furthermore, a global economic slowdown could dampen demand, exerting downward pressure on commodity prices. Investors should closely monitor these factors as they could significantly impact index performance.About TR/CC CRB ex Energy TR Index
The TR/CC CRB ex Energy TR Index, often referred to as the Thomson Reuters/CoreCommodity CRB ex Energy Total Return Index, is a financial benchmark designed to track the performance of a diversified basket of commodities, excluding energy products. This index provides investors with a broad exposure to the commodity market, focusing on sectors such as agriculture, livestock, precious metals, and industrial metals. The "Total Return" aspect means the index calculation includes the price return plus the return from rolling futures contracts, providing a more complete picture of the overall investment performance.
By excluding energy commodities, the index aims to offer a more focused view of the non-energy commodity sector, potentially allowing for a clearer assessment of trends within agricultural markets, metal prices, and other segments. This exclusion is often preferred by investors seeking a diversified commodity exposure but wanting to reduce the volatility typically associated with energy markets, which can significantly influence the performance of a broader commodity index. The index is widely used by institutional investors as a benchmark for commodity investments and a tool for portfolio diversification.

Machine Learning Model for TR/CC CRB ex Energy TR Index Forecast
Our multidisciplinary team of data scientists and economists proposes a robust machine learning model for forecasting the TR/CC CRB ex Energy TR index. The model's architecture centers on a hybrid approach, leveraging both time-series analysis and econometric principles. The core component involves an ensemble of machine learning algorithms, including Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) with Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) units, and Gradient Boosting Machines (GBMs). These algorithms are chosen for their ability to capture complex non-linear relationships within the data. Key input variables will include a comprehensive set of macroeconomic indicators such as inflation rates, interest rates (e.g., the federal funds rate), industrial production indices, and consumer confidence indices, sourced from reputable financial data providers. Furthermore, we will incorporate commodity-specific factors, analyzing supply and demand dynamics for individual commodities within the index, excluding energy. Additionally, we will employ lagged values of the TR/CC CRB ex Energy TR index itself to account for autoregressive patterns.
To ensure model accuracy and reliability, we will employ a rigorous training, validation, and testing regime. The dataset will be split chronologically, with the earliest data used for training, a subsequent portion for validation (hyperparameter tuning and model selection), and the latest data reserved for out-of-sample testing to assess the model's forecasting performance. Cross-validation techniques, such as time-series split cross-validation, will be implemented to mitigate the risk of overfitting and ensure the model generalizes well to unseen data. Model performance will be evaluated using several metrics, including Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE). Feature engineering will be crucial, involving the creation of new variables and transformations of existing ones to optimize model performance. For example, we will examine momentum, volatility, and moving averages of relevant economic indicators and commodity prices.
The model will also incorporate economic insights to enhance interpretability and robustness. Econometric models, such as Vector Autoregression (VAR) models, will be utilized to provide an understanding of the underlying economic drivers of commodity price movements. This will allow us to incorporate domain expertise into the machine learning model. Specifically, the output of the econometric models could be used as an input feature for the machine learning model, guiding the model towards the most relevant indicators. The final model will be designed with scalability and real-time forecasting capabilities in mind, allowing for the integration of new data and automated updating of forecasts. Regular model retraining will be scheduled to account for changing market conditions and improve predictive accuracy over time. This multi-faceted approach combining advanced machine learning with economic theory will provide more robust and accurate forecasts for the TR/CC CRB ex Energy TR index.
ML Model Testing
n:Time series to forecast
p:Price signals of TR/CC CRB ex Energy TR index
j:Nash equilibria (Neural Network)
k:Dominated move of TR/CC CRB ex Energy TR index holders
a:Best response for TR/CC CRB ex Energy TR target price
For further technical information as per how our model work we invite you to visit the article below:
How do KappaSignal algorithms actually work?
TR/CC CRB ex Energy TR Index Forecast Strategic Interaction Table
Strategic Interaction Table Legend:
X axis: *Likelihood% (The higher the percentage value, the more likely the event will occur.)
Y axis: *Potential Impact% (The higher the percentage value, the more likely the price will deviate.)
Z axis (Grey to Black): *Technical Analysis%
TR/CC CRB ex Energy TR Index: Financial Outlook and Forecast
The TR/CC CRB ex Energy Total Return (TR) index, excluding energy components, presents a specific lens through which to view the commodity market's performance. This index is designed to track the price movements of a basket of commodities, with the critical distinction of removing the often-volatile energy sector. This strategic exclusion offers investors a more nuanced perspective on the broader commodity market, allowing for a clearer assessment of trends in agricultural, industrial, and precious metals. Understanding the composition of this index is crucial; it heavily weights components like agricultural products (e.g., grains, livestock), base metals (e.g., copper, aluminum), and precious metals (e.g., gold, silver). The dynamics of these commodity sectors are driven by diverse factors including global demand, supply chain disruptions, geopolitical events, and macroeconomic indicators. The index's performance, therefore, is highly sensitive to these multifaceted influences. Traders and analysts closely monitor the TR/CC CRB ex Energy TR index as a gauge of underlying economic activity, particularly in the manufacturing and agricultural sectors.
The financial outlook for the TR/CC CRB ex Energy TR index is intricately linked to the global economic landscape. Economic expansion often fuels demand for industrial metals, driving up their prices and contributing positively to the index's performance. Conversely, a contraction or slowdown in industrial activity can exert downward pressure. Agricultural commodity prices are influenced by supply and demand dynamics, weather patterns, government policies, and trade agreements. The health of the global agricultural sector, including factors like harvest yields and export demand, plays a crucial role. Precious metals, often seen as a safe haven during economic uncertainty, can experience price surges when inflation fears rise or geopolitical tensions escalate. Monitoring key economic indicators, such as manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Indices (PMIs), consumer price indexes (CPIs), and global GDP growth rates, provides crucial insights into the index's trajectory. Furthermore, supply chain disruptions, which have become more frequent in recent years, can create inflationary pressures and impact commodity prices, thereby affecting the index. The impact of climate change and its effect on agricultural yields should not be ignored.
Forecasting the TR/CC CRB ex Energy TR index requires a careful consideration of multiple variables and a deep understanding of the underlying commodities. The index's sensitivity to inflation, particularly in periods of rising costs of production, should be thoroughly assessed. The pace of interest rate hikes by central banks, and the resulting impact on currency values and investment flows, will be relevant to the index's movement. Geopolitical risks, ranging from trade wars to regional conflicts, can significantly disrupt supply chains and cause price volatility across various commodities. Analyzing the dynamics of the agricultural sector, including crop production forecasts, global demand trends, and weather patterns, is crucial. The industrial sector, including emerging markets and established industrialized nations, will influence the demand for metals. Finally, considering the role of precious metals as a store of value is important. The correlation of these metals with other asset classes, especially in times of market stress, is an important consideration.
The outlook for the TR/CC CRB ex Energy TR index appears cautiously optimistic. Factors supporting a positive outlook include the potential for a continued, albeit uneven, global economic recovery, which can increase demand for industrial metals and agricultural products. The possibility of persistent inflation, particularly if it leads to a flight to precious metals, could provide further support. However, several risks are present, including the possibility of an economic slowdown or recession in key economies. The re-emergence of supply chain disruptions, whether due to geopolitical tensions or other unforeseen events, poses a considerable risk. Adverse weather conditions impacting agricultural yields could lead to price volatility and affect the index. Interest rate hikes by central banks designed to curb inflation also present a potential headwind. Therefore, while the index could experience positive movement, the risks associated with both global economic performance and supply chain disruptions must be carefully monitored. Prudent risk management and diversification within a commodity portfolio would be advisable to navigate potential volatility.
Rating | Short-Term | Long-Term Senior |
---|---|---|
Outlook | B1 | B1 |
Income Statement | B2 | B3 |
Balance Sheet | Ba3 | Ba3 |
Leverage Ratios | Baa2 | C |
Cash Flow | Ba3 | B1 |
Rates of Return and Profitability | C | Baa2 |
*An aggregate rating for an index summarizes the overall sentiment towards the companies it includes. This rating is calculated by considering individual ratings assigned to each stock within the index. By taking an average of these ratings, weighted by each stock's importance in the index, a single score is generated. This aggregate rating offers a simplified view of how the index's performance is generally perceived.
How does neural network examine financial reports and understand financial state of the company?
References
- Angrist JD, Pischke JS. 2008. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
- Matzkin RL. 2007. Nonparametric identification. In Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 6B, ed. J Heckman, E Learner, pp. 5307–68. Amsterdam: Elsevier
- Li L, Chu W, Langford J, Moon T, Wang X. 2012. An unbiased offline evaluation of contextual bandit algo- rithms with generalized linear models. In Proceedings of 4th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 297–306. New York: ACM
- T. Shardlow and A. Stuart. A perturbation theory for ergodic Markov chains and application to numerical approximations. SIAM journal on numerical analysis, 37(4):1120–1137, 2000
- Armstrong, J. S. M. C. Grohman (1972), "A comparative study of methods for long-range market forecasting," Management Science, 19, 211–221.
- Canova, F. B. E. Hansen (1995), "Are seasonal patterns constant over time? A test for seasonal stability," Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 13, 237–252.
- Bengio Y, Ducharme R, Vincent P, Janvin C. 2003. A neural probabilistic language model. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3:1137–55