Dominant Strategy : Hold
Time series to forecast n: 04 Jun 2023 for (n+16 weeks)
Methodology : Modular Neural Network (Social Media Sentiment Analysis)
Abstract
Champion Iron Limited prediction model is evaluated with Modular Neural Network (Social Media Sentiment Analysis) and Spearman Correlation1,2,3,4 and it is concluded that the CIA:TSX stock is predictable in the short/long term. According to price forecasts for (n+16 weeks) period, the dominant strategy among neural network is: HoldKey Points
- Game Theory
- Dominated Move
- What is statistical models in machine learning?
CIA:TSX Target Price Prediction Modeling Methodology
We consider Champion Iron Limited Decision Process with Modular Neural Network (Social Media Sentiment Analysis) where A is the set of discrete actions of CIA:TSX stock holders, F is the set of discrete states, P : S × F × S → R is the transition probability distribution, R : S × F → R is the reaction function, and γ ∈ [0, 1] is a move factor for expectation.1,2,3,4
F(Spearman Correlation)5,6,7= X R(Modular Neural Network (Social Media Sentiment Analysis)) X S(n):→ (n+16 weeks)
n:Time series to forecast
p:Price signals of CIA:TSX stock
j:Nash equilibria (Neural Network)
k:Dominated move
a:Best response for target price
For further technical information as per how our model work we invite you to visit the article below:
How do AC Investment Research machine learning (predictive) algorithms actually work?
CIA:TSX Stock Forecast (Buy or Sell) for (n+16 weeks)
Sample Set: Neural NetworkStock/Index: CIA:TSX Champion Iron Limited
Time series to forecast n: 04 Jun 2023 for (n+16 weeks)
According to price forecasts for (n+16 weeks) period, the dominant strategy among neural network is: Hold
X axis: *Likelihood% (The higher the percentage value, the more likely the event will occur.)
Y axis: *Potential Impact% (The higher the percentage value, the more likely the price will deviate.)
Z axis (Grey to Black): *Technical Analysis%
IFRS Reconciliation Adjustments for Champion Iron Limited
- Lifetime expected credit losses are generally expected to be recognised before a financial instrument becomes past due. Typically, credit risk increases significantly before a financial instrument becomes past due or other lagging borrower-specific factors (for example, a modification or restructuring) are observed. Consequently when reasonable and supportable information that is more forward-looking than past due information is available without undue cost or effort, it must be used to assess changes in credit risk.
- Hedging relationships that qualified for hedge accounting in accordance with IAS 39 that also qualify for hedge accounting in accordance with the criteria of this Standard (see paragraph 6.4.1), after taking into account any rebalancing of the hedging relationship on transition (see paragraph 7.2.25(b)), shall be regarded as continuing hedging relationships.
- An entity shall apply this Standard retrospectively, in accordance with IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors, except as specified in paragraphs 7.2.4–7.2.26 and 7.2.28. This Standard shall not be applied to items that have already been derecognised at the date of initial application.
- IFRS 7 defines credit risk as 'the risk that one party to a financial instrument will cause a financial loss for the other party by failing to discharge an obligation'. The requirement in paragraph 5.7.7(a) relates to the risk that the issuer will fail to perform on that particular liability. It does not necessarily relate to the creditworthiness of the issuer. For example, if an entity issues a collateralised liability and a non-collateralised liability that are otherwise identical, the credit risk of those two liabilities will be different, even though they are issued by the same entity. The credit risk on the collateralised liability will be less than the credit risk of the non-collateralised liability. The credit risk for a collateralised liability may be close to zero.
*International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) adjustment process involves reviewing the company's financial statements and identifying any differences between the company's current accounting practices and the requirements of the IFRS. If there are any such differences, neural network makes adjustments to financial statements to bring them into compliance with the IFRS.
Conclusions
Champion Iron Limited is assigned short-term Ba1 & long-term Ba1 estimated rating. Champion Iron Limited prediction model is evaluated with Modular Neural Network (Social Media Sentiment Analysis) and Spearman Correlation1,2,3,4 and it is concluded that the CIA:TSX stock is predictable in the short/long term. According to price forecasts for (n+16 weeks) period, the dominant strategy among neural network is: Hold
CIA:TSX Champion Iron Limited Financial Analysis*
Rating | Short-Term | Long-Term Senior |
---|---|---|
Outlook* | Ba1 | Ba1 |
Income Statement | Caa2 | Caa2 |
Balance Sheet | Baa2 | Baa2 |
Leverage Ratios | Caa2 | C |
Cash Flow | Baa2 | Baa2 |
Rates of Return and Profitability | B1 | B3 |
*Financial analysis is the process of evaluating a company's financial performance and position by neural network. It involves reviewing the company's financial statements, including the balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement, as well as other financial reports and documents.
How does neural network examine financial reports and understand financial state of the company?
Prediction Confidence Score

References
- Chernozhukov V, Newey W, Robins J. 2018c. Double/de-biased machine learning using regularized Riesz representers. arXiv:1802.08667 [stat.ML]
- Lai TL, Robbins H. 1985. Asymptotically efficient adaptive allocation rules. Adv. Appl. Math. 6:4–22
- Semenova V, Goldman M, Chernozhukov V, Taddy M. 2018. Orthogonal ML for demand estimation: high dimensional causal inference in dynamic panels. arXiv:1712.09988 [stat.ML]
- D. Bertsekas. Dynamic programming and optimal control. Athena Scientific, 1995.
- Bai J. 2003. Inferential theory for factor models of large dimensions. Econometrica 71:135–71
- Morris CN. 1983. Parametric empirical Bayes inference: theory and applications. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 78:47–55
- Blei DM, Lafferty JD. 2009. Topic models. In Text Mining: Classification, Clustering, and Applications, ed. A Srivastava, M Sahami, pp. 101–24. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: What is the prediction methodology for CIA:TSX stock?A: CIA:TSX stock prediction methodology: We evaluate the prediction models Modular Neural Network (Social Media Sentiment Analysis) and Spearman Correlation
Q: Is CIA:TSX stock a buy or sell?
A: The dominant strategy among neural network is to Hold CIA:TSX Stock.
Q: Is Champion Iron Limited stock a good investment?
A: The consensus rating for Champion Iron Limited is Hold and is assigned short-term Ba1 & long-term Ba1 estimated rating.
Q: What is the consensus rating of CIA:TSX stock?
A: The consensus rating for CIA:TSX is Hold.
Q: What is the prediction period for CIA:TSX stock?
A: The prediction period for CIA:TSX is (n+16 weeks)